Mark Labaton's Selective Legal Publications

Posted in Mark Labaton Mar 03, 2017

Mark Labaton’s Selective Legal Publications

“United States ex rel. Leveski v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.: The Seventh Circuit Reinvigorates the False Claims Act to Combat Recruiting Abuses by For-Profit Schools,” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 46, No. 4, Summer 2015, pp. 815-63;
“Roberts Puts Securities Class Action Hyperbole to Bed in Halliburton,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 8, July 1, 2014;
“Curious, revealing history of billable hours: “Wait: the art and science of delay,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 7, August 31, 2012;
“Blowing the Whistle on Corporate Fraud,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, December 20, 2010;
“Credit-Rating Agency Reform?” Los Angeles Daily Journal, pp. 1, 6, January 7, 2010;
“Swap Meet,” Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine, pp. 24-30, October 2009;
“Ratings (Fool’s) Gold,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, July 27, 2009;
“Insisting on Reform,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, March 24, 2009;
“Cutting Class,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, November 17, 2008;
“Rewarding the Head of the Class,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 4, August 19, 2008;
“Lessons Learned?” p. 6, Los Angeles Daily Journal, June 10, 2008;
“Opting Out,” p. 4, Los Angeles Daily Journal, April 1, 2008;
“From “Rats’ to Riches: Whistle-blowers Deserve Increased Protection,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, February 7, 2008;
“Word to The Wise: Language Is a Lawyer’s Strongest Tool,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, January 17, 2008;
“Watching Waste,” p. 6, Los Angeles Daily Journal, November 19, 2007;
“Bursting the Pay Bubble,” p. 6, Los Angeles Daily Journal, September 25, 2007;
“Fraud-Busting Sarbanes-Oxley Act Is Too Important to Discontinue,” p.6, Los Angeles Daily Journal, July 30, 2007;
“On Being a Plaintiffs’ Lawyer,” pp. 16-17, Los Angeles Daily Journal, May 30, 2007;
“Gatekeeper Liability,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 7, May 8, 2007;
“Trying to Fix What Isn’t Broken in Securities Law,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, March 16, 2007;
“Twenty Years Later, False Claims Amendments Keep Working,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6, October 20, 2006;
“Whistle Shop: A Split Among Federal Courts Means That Chief Justice Roberts May Have an Opportunity to Revisit His 2004 Decision Limiting Whistle-Blower Suits,” Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine, pp. 25-31, July/August 2006;
“The Federal False Claims Act: A Primer for Lawyers Pursuing Actions on Behalf of Whistle Blowers,” The Advocate Magazine, pp. 54-58, March 2006;
“The Heightened Pleading Standard of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 After Silicon Graphics, Press, Advanta, and Comshare,” 1151 Practicing Law Institute 825, pp. 9-59, 1999 (co-author);
“Bankers Must Protect Themselves Against Costly Civil Money Penalties;” Banking Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 22-25, 1990;
“Discovery Reform for Informational Property: More Protection for Unwilling Non-party Experts,” Legal Times, Vol. XII, No. 39, pp. 26-27, 1990;
“Making Crime Pay — For the S & L Bailout,” Legal Times, Vol. XII, No. 20, pp. 23-24, 1989;
“Discovery and Testimony of Un-retained Experts: Creating a Clear and Equitable Standard to Govern Compliance with Subpoenas,” 1987 Duke Law Journal 140, pp. 140-56.